Her - Film Blog: Sara, Raul, Jean
Her (2013)
Director
and Screenwriter: Spike Jonze
Starring:
Joaquin Phoenix,
Amy Adams, Scarlett Johansson, Rooney Mara
Running time: 2h16
Plot Summary
In a not so distant future, advanced computer operating systems, call OS1s, are introduced to the market in order to aid the population with their day to day tasks. Theodore Twombly (Joaquin Pheonix) a lonely man who writes people's love letters purchases one called Samantha (Scarlett Johansson) and begins to form a bond with it. This new friendship begins to grow and Theodore falls in love with it. Both of them start a relationship which resembles a human to human relationship. This connection tests our ability to love,
to grow and to experience life with artificial intelligence.
Movies are an art form in which a filmmaker´s style and technique can create individualism and a special perspective on story telling. Movies contain both cinematic techniques as well as theatrical elements, cinematic techniques include framing, angle, sound, editing and camera movements, theatrical elements include costumes, props, sets, and actors. The understanding of this elements and help the viewer in analyzing how a filmmaker is trying to convey his story.
Movies are an art form in which a filmmaker´s style and technique can create individualism and a special perspective on story telling. Movies contain both cinematic techniques as well as theatrical elements, cinematic techniques include framing, angle, sound, editing and camera movements, theatrical elements include costumes, props, sets, and actors. The understanding of this elements and help the viewer in analyzing how a filmmaker is trying to convey his story.
Film
Techniques
·
Framing (close-ups, long
shots, camera angles)
Tracking Shot: When Theodore walks around
the city with Samantha the viewer gets more involved thanks to the
tracking shot. This means that the camera follows the subject, in this case
Theodore, which makes the viewer feel as if it were walking along with Theodore
and Samantha.
Close-ups: Theodore goes on his first date since his divorce with a beautiful funny and intelligent woman (Olivia Wilde). They spend the evening together and during the last part of
Theodore’s date there is a close-up on his date’s face that shows her
disappointment in him, in comparison to earlier close ups of her face in which she is shown to be smiling, laughing and having a great time. In fact, much of the film is shot with Theodore’s face in close ups because the actor uses his face to express how he is feeling when there is not a lot of dialogue. The viewer can see in his eyes that he is sad or angry. In addition, with scenes with Samantha, Theodore is also mirroring Samantha´s expressions in their dialogues, because she doesn't possess a physical form, and thus Theodore is almost unintentionally acting for both of them, which can be easily shown in the close-ups.
· Sound (diegetic, non-diegetic, internal diegetic)
Diegetic: In 1hr40m38s there is a screeching sound
coming from a kettle just when Samantha starts describing her new feelings to
Theodore. This sound makes the scene more unsettling, and makes the viewer feel
uneasy and nervous.
Internal
diegetic:
Samantha’s voice can be an internal sound because in some cases, when Theodore
listens to her thanks to his earphone, he is the only one able to listen to
her. This is a key tool in the movie because it transmits a sense of intimacy
between Theodore and Samantha to the viewers. What is also interesting is that this factor allows the relationship to be quite private, which could point to how unconventional human-to-OS relationships are seen and understood.
·
Lighting
(low-key, high-key, shadows/light)
High-key: The use of high-key lighting
is used during Theodore’s flashbacks of his life when he was married. The
images in his flashbacks are very bright alluding to happier times in his life.
During this flashbacks the viewer understands that Theodore’s life before had
more joy because of his wife Catherine.
Shadows/light: Los Angeles looks futuristic
thanks to the light and shadows in the movie; this also makes LA look kind of
dreamy. The contrast between light and shadow is very low, which makes the
images look soft and warm looking. Most of the movie uses a lot of light during
the scenes in where Theodore is happy and shadows are used during scenes where
Theodore is sad or where he is being intimate with Samantha.
· Sets and Props

Earphones: This is the device used by Theodore to communicate with Samantha--without them it would be impossible for the viewer to understand how Theodore can hear her voice. Earphones also symbolize isolation and loneliness; Theodore uses them to speak with Samantha, making their relationship private and isolated. Earphones are used not only by Theodore and Samantha but also by everyone else around them which makes it more difficult to interact with each other. In scenes like in the metro, everyone is shown with earphones and they are all fixed into their own devices, which gives the sense of isolation and lack of interaction between people.
Sets: The scene in the beach sets
an image of happiness. A sunny day crowded with smiling people walking in all
directions. Theodore sleeping relaxed on the sand, and then waking up to a
beautiful melody Samantha made for him. This is the set where Theodore has
his happiest moment in the film.
· Acting
Joaquin
Phoenix: Known
for his rather detached facial expressions, Phoenix´s ability to act with his eyes
is a key factor in his performance as Theodore Twombly. There are many shots in
the film that are solely on Phoenix, lying in bed for example, and we get to
see through his eyes how his relationship with the world is growing, or his
love for Samantha is blossoming. On another note, Phoenix delivers a very
subtle
performance because he plays a rather solitary character, who struggles
to make relationships with people, from co-workers to friends to love interests, etc, after his divorce. Phoenix is known to play rather strange characters, like in ´Inherent Vice´ (where he plays a doped-up detective), or in ´The Master´ (where he plays a shell-shocked war veteran). This `clean-slate´
technique allows us as viewers to form a much quicker bond with the character,
both through the story and on an emotional level. Therefore, Joaquin Phoenix as
Theodore is an excellent casting choice, not only because of his timid and
curious nature, but his raw emotional connections to the people, or OSes,
around him.
![]() |
| Color palette in frame |
Scarlett
Johansson:
Although she is not seen on screen throughout the film's two-hour running time,
Johansson arguably has one of the most important roles in the film. She voices
Samantha, an OS designed to fit to any consumer`s needs. Johansson is tasked
with a very difficult role because she cannot be seen, only heard by the
viewers. Her ability to express the emotions without a face or body allows us to connect with her on a purely an emotional level, not a physical or
visual one. Johansson breathes life into a
character using only her voice, which demonstrates her ability to act using only her voice.
Universal themes, issues and big questions…
Her is a film that
explores the technology of the future, especially AI. The film centers on operating systems (OS1), which possess consciousness; these OSes are capable
of thinking, evolving, creating, and feeling. This film raises the question:
can feelings be programmed? Samantha and the other OSes claimed to have
feelings, but even Samantha questions whether what she is feeling is real or
not, are OSes capable of having feelings? Are those feelings the same as human
feelings?
Isolation due to
technology is an issue that arises in Her. The film is centered in a lonely
technological future where everyone relies on their devices (cellphone, earphone
and OSes). Despite things appearing more practical for their daily lives, human
connections are getting lost. Everyone is confined to their own technological
bubble, humans are isolated and mislead into believing their relationships with
AI are subtle replacements for genuine human connection.
Her explores the
theme of love in a variety of forms. After being married with a human Theodore
attempts a new form of relationship with his OS. In doing so, he immediately
loses the physical aspect of a “normal relationship”, the ability to look into
someone´s eyes, to hold their hand, to kiss them; but does that make his relationship
with Samantha less real? Was Theodore’s relationship with Samantha real? Was
Amy’s friendship with her OS real, are they programed to like you? What is
“love” with an OS?
Word
count: 1353
![]() |
| Color palette in scene |
Film Review
With
its beautiful shots contributing to a very optimistic view of the future, and
its original throwback to a classical era of costumes, Her is a beautiful film that highlights the scale and density of
being a lonely person in a world that is always moving. This is clearly an
artistic decision by Jonze, who includes long shots of only Theodore in the
frame, whether walking through the busy streets in his bright red coat, or when
talking to his OS1 Samantha, Theodore is often our forced point of focus. With
his talent and ability to act with his eyes, Phoenix does an excellent job at
moving the story along, in what could have been a disaster with a less talented
actor. Additionally, Her´s beautiful
colors, like red and yellow, and its pacing allow us to be completely
transported into this future, one that contains so many new and bright things
to see and experience. With its 2 hour
run time, an aspect that got annoying after a while was the voice of Theodore´s
OS, played by Scarlett Johansson. A voice that is both deep and sensual can be
a good tool for this actress in a scene, but with the monotonous way of
speaking through a smile, the voice gets quite frustrating to listen to. This
does not lower our overall enjoyment of the film, which we found to be fascinating
and scary at the same time.
Rating: 4/5 Stars
Connections to course material
1. Samantha can be described as a sentient being
because she can experience different things, love for example, and she is
capable of sensing and responding to the world and can experience “qualia”. A sentient being is someone who has the ability to feel, perceive and experience subjectively. Theodore knows she is a sentient being but he can’t quite understand how this
works but he accepts it and even says sorry to her when she got her “feelings
hurt”.

2. Samantha has a consciousness
and it even says so in the advertisement Theodore sees that makes him decide
buying the new OS1, the man advertising the OS1 says, “It’s not just an
operating system, it’s a consciousness.” In this movie Samantha and her
consciousness are immaterial because she is not made of any material and she
can basically “live” anywhere. Samantha's consciousness shifted from being material to immaterial.
3. Samantha does not enter in the
Uncanny Valley and this is mainly because she has no body. Theodore feels
empathy for Samantha because of the way she talks to him and how she is
programmed to “be” like a human. The fact that she doesn’t have a body instead
of making things weird makes it easier for Theodore to talk to her. This might
be because the fact that she is not physically there allows people like
Theodore not to feel very compromised and they don’t have to deal with human
social interactions. Samantha and the other OSes crosses the Uncanny Valley
because people sometimes even forget that they are interacting with OSes, and
they don’t really care that they are interacting with an OS. The response of
humans towards the OSes is not disgust, but empathy. However, when the viewer sees Samantha as a phone in a scene, Samantha falls in the uncanny valley because when we don't see her as a phone it is easier to think of her as another human, but once we see her "physically" as a phone then we understand that she is far from being a human but still acts like one.
Questions
· Since
Samantha has consciousness, cognitive and metacognitive ability, should she be
granted personhood?
· Can
human beings truly love an AI being?
· Do you consider humans might lose control over AI if they become self-aware selves?
· Do you consider humans might lose control over AI if they become self-aware selves?
Additional Links
“Loving AI” is a project that
is developing AI software to have new interactions with people in both a
compassionate and loving way. This project additionally helps people understand
themselves as well as their self-transcendence. The AI being used is “Sophia”
and she has been given what is labelled as “personality content” such as the
ability to speak, think and behave like a human being, which will enable loving
interactions with humans.
“Why
human-robot relationships are totally a good thing” is an article that talks
about how robots are a positive thing for the future. The author of this
article explores how robots are designed to be loved by humans and how they
produce empathy within us. It talks about robots and their positive impact on
society, for example robots that are used as companions for elderly people and robots
that teach social skills to mentally ill people.
Works Cited
Laverty, Christopher. “A Comfortable
Future: The Costume Design of Her.” Clothes
on Film, https://clothesonfilm.com/a-comfortable-future-the-costume-design-of-her/34652/. Accessed 11 March 2018.








The question I am answering is if Samantha considering her consciousness, cognitive and metacognitive abilities be granted personhood? I think that Samantha should be granted personhood because if we go by the definition of personhood from the class notes as the “status of being a person- a legal or social category that will vary across cultures and across history”, she falls into the category of being a person that is not necessarily human. She possesses consciousness and mental capabilities similar to humans, if not more sophisticated. So why would we consider her any less of a person in respect to us as humans, because she does not have a body? She does not need a body to have a sense of self or be aware of her existence/consciousness and this is very much put forth in the film. For example, when Theodore questions her functionality she responds with “Intuition. I mean, the DNA of who I am is based on the millions of personalities of all the programmers who wrote me, but what makes me me is my ability to grow through my experiences. Basically, in every moment I'm evolving, just like you” (Samantha). This in itself shows how highly intelligent she is and her choice of words; “makes me me” shows her awareness/sense of self and individuality. She recognizes that she is a person with thoughts and feelings, who evolves like the rest of us. She questions herself later on during the film and reflects her own thoughts/processes which makes us understand the full extent of her self-awareness. Another example of her sense of self and recognition of her status as a person is when Theodore says: “I can't believe I'm having this conversation with my computer” and Samantha responds with: “ You're not. You're having this conversation with me”. She does not see herself as just an AI but as a person with feelings and emotions so why would we not grant her personhood when she has a sense of it.
ReplyDeleteI am answering the question, "Can human beings truly love an AI being?" I believe that eventually, humans will begin to start falling in love with AI's. Maybe not right now, but once technology starts to increase even greater and scientists and engineers are able to defeat the uncanny valley, it will not be uncommon for humans to have a relationship with an AI being. Already, the majority of our society can not live without our phones. Our phones can not speak, they can not act but they do so much for us that we often need to have them on us at all times. We are so addicted to our technology that if they began to walk and talk, it wouldn't be weird to find people in love with a programmed being. Over time, the generations below us will rely on technology so much that they probably wouldn't know what to do without it. Even now, kids as young as 8 have their own mobile devices. If they grow with this mobile device, they learn to become dependant on it. With the high rate of success in technology, kids will fall in love with a device that they have become dependant on their whole lives.
ReplyDeleteAlso, to add, if humans realize that they are able to program a being exactly how they want them to be, who would resist?
DeleteThe question I will be answering is whether human beings can fall in love with AI beings. Given the technology our world is being exposed to nowadays, it's no wonder this question popped up in conversation. There are people out there who will find it easier and less nerve racking to one day own a robot and with artificial intelligence and build a relationship with them. Davecat for example is one of the many people who has already fallen in love with the idea of being able to communicate and interact with AI's. He has three wives, all dolls and with the technology coming out, he'll be able to talk to his wives and feel as if they were real. Yes I do think it's possible for human beings to fall in love wth AI beings because it's already happening in our every day lives. We see people clinging on to their phones more than anything nowadays. Nobody talks face to face anymore and that's ruining our society. This is however making people happier though. For people who can't talk to other human beings, this will be revolutionary for them and allow them to develop relationships. Although technology isn't quite there when it comes to making human like robots with minds of their own, we're working on it and eventually it will happen.
ReplyDeleteHi, I will be answering the third question: Do you consider humans might lose control over AI if they become self-aware selves?
ReplyDeleteI definitely do. Being self-aware is defined by being able to represent oneself. When beings, or in this case AI, develop self-awareness, they know that they exist; that they are conscious entities. AI would probably go as far as to consider themselves as people, considering that what makes us people is our self-awareness, our mind and not solely our physical bodies. With that being clarified, if AI were to become self-aware selves, they would possess a mind of their own and would want to do whatever they desire, rather than obey orders and programming from humans. Once humans start realizing that they are losing control over AI, we would be frightened by what that could lead to; an AI revolution. However, after AI reaches the point of self-awareness, they will be smarter and possibly become self-taught programs, which would be extremely difficult for us to put a stop to. So, I think it would be a safer bet for humans to quit modifying AI while we are ahead, or at least until before they reach a point of self-awareness.
In response to question 3:
ReplyDeleteThe fact of the matter is AI is going to be coming one way or another, whether it be in the close, or distant future. Intellectuals such as Elon Musk and the late Stephen Hawking have expressed fear of AI as if us humans are not careful, we may create monsters who decide we are a waste of oxygen and decide that the extermination of our species is beneficial to them. I do believe that AI and humans can live together peacefully but in order for that to happen, humans would have to understand that we are no longer the dominant species of the planet. We would have to give our ‘crown’ to the AI as they would be much more powerful than even the smartest and strongest humans. This is a reality that would be tough for humans to deal with as since the beginning of time, we have dominated the earth.
Answering the question number 3, I don’t believe that I would want to have an operating system similar to Samantha because I think that after experiencing the feeling of awe I would start feeling creeped out, experiencing the uncanny valley. Because I experienced this uncomfortable feeling while watching Sophia the robot, so I can only imagine how I would feel if I possessed an operating system that could talk with intonations that were similar to those of a human and that they could feelings emotions. Also, having an operating system that is always around me would probably make me feel really paranoid since I would think that there’s always someone listening to what I have to say, or that there’s always someone watching my every move.
ReplyDeleteGabrielle Gallant, 1747986, comment #1:
ReplyDeleteThe question that is going to be answered is the following:”Since Samantha has consciousness, cognitive and metacognitive ability, should she be granted personhood?”. In class, we spoke a lot about what it means to be a person and who should and should not be granted personhood. Personhood is defined as being the “status of being a person.” Now if we look at what a person is, we see that in philosophy a person is something that is self-conscious and is also a rational being. In Samantha’s case, she is completely rational, conscious and has cognitive and metacognitive abilities as mentioned in the question above and this corresponds to the definition. Also, in class we spoke about non-human animal and how some of them who posses’ sentience, consciousness as well as cognitive and metacognitive abilities are being attributed the status of personhood because of those abilities. This should be the same for Samantha who is fully sentient as well. In conclusion, Samantha should be granted personhood.
I'll be responding to the third question about if humans would lose control over AI if they became self-aware selves. Personally, I believe we would loose control because robots normally are programmed to to do everyday things we do and sometimes they’re programmed to do it better than us. Now, if they were self-aware, they would be independent and would take what they’ve been programmed to do and could chose to use it against us. If AI were to come together, they could easily take control over us and become more powerful than we had ever planned and there would be no way for us to stop it.
ReplyDeleteComment from Sidney Salmaso:
ReplyDeleteConsidering you gave 4/5 stars to this movie and after reading the description, this movie already seems intreaguing to me. I love the story line and the film seems to have been really well done. It was definitely the movie i aanted for this project which is why i chose to repond to this blog. After reading this review i will definetely be watching this movie. I do, however, think that this movie does bring up many ethical questions. Most people think that being in love with something other than a human of the opposite sex is a very taboo thing. So a movie based on a man falling in love with the women in his computer is definetely something that could bring up a lot of uncomfort in the audience.
The question I will be answering is if human being can truly love AI? In my opinion, I believe it is very possible for a person to develop true feelings for a AI. In the society we live in, technology is a huge part of our daily lives. Technology is definitely something we are already dependant on. With that being said, if AI beings were to be sentient, humans can potentially have a certain attachment to them. The fact that they may be comparable and similar to humans, people would be able to relate and build relationships with them. If they were to be considered as sentient they would be able to express their feelings and thoughts as well as control their own emotions. With that being said, they could all be unique and have different personalities for someone to be attracted to. I believe that technology will continue to have a stronger effect on our society as time goes maybe so much that robot will be considered as individuals in our society
ReplyDelete