Blade Runner - Film Review. By Alyssa Collazos-Alva, Myriam Levasseur, Patricia Madalengoitia Vera & Chloé Yacoub
Blade Runner
1982
Alyssa Collazos-Alva
Myriam Levasseur
Patricia Madalengoitia Vera
Chloé Yacoub
Screen-writer: Hampton Fancher & David Peoples
Main Actors: Harrison Ford as Rick Deckard, Sean Young as Rachael, Rutger Haeur as Roy Batty & Edward James Olmo as Gaff
Running Time: 177 minutes
_________________________________________________________________________________
Summary:
In the year 2019, Los Angeles has turned into a dark and polluted city. In this futuristic society, Blade Runners are the police whose mission is to kill Replicants – human-like robots that have been programmed to “live” for three to four years as slave labour. Deckard, a former Blade Runner, is asked to find and kill a group of four rebel Replicants – Leon, Zhora, Pris and Roy. They escaped from the Off-world Colonies and committed various crimes in search for freedom and an extended lifespan. During Deckard's hunt, he meets another Replicant, named Rachael, and starts falling in love with her. This makes him question whether Replicants can feel human emotions and gets him very confused about the emotions that he feels for her. Deckard is also challenged into believing that he could be a Replicant himself throughout his journey.
Cinematic Techniques:
Editing:
- Point of view editing: To demonstrate one of Deckard’s inner thoughts, the editor includes a scene in which a unicorn is running around a forest. This scene is very important, because it proves later on that Deckard could in fact be a Replicant. This type of editing emphasizes on the fact that only Deckard is supposed to remember his dream about a unicorn. The last few seconds of the movie show Deckard picking up a unicorn-shaped origami that Gaff, the detective, had left for him to see. This insinuates that Gaff knows about Deckard's dream, even though Deckard had never spoken about it to anyone, which could only mean that he is a Replicant whose dreams and thoughts can be seen by anyone who has access to them.
- Cross-cutting: To build suspense, the editor chose to use cross-cutting for the confrontation scene between Deckard and Roy. When the scene is edited in a way that the cuts switch quickly from one character to another, it builds tension because it portrays how quickly everything is happening, which in this scene is a life or death situation.
Framing:
- Close-up: To emphasize on the character’s emotions, Roy is framed tearing up in close-up right before dying. It is important to see Roy, a Replicant, cry right after sparing Deckard's life because it makes us question whether Replicants truly are as bad as the authorities from that society makes them sound. It makes us question what is a human and what is a Replicant.
- Medium shot: While Zhora is running away from Deckard, she is framed in medium shot to show the distress in her facial expressions while also focusing on the fact that everyone else proceeds with their lives as if no one is being chased around at gun point.
Lighting:
- High-key: The scene during which Deckard meets Rachael has one of the highest lighting throughout the movie to demonstrate the spark that Rachael lights up in Rick.
- Low-key/high-key: Every scene in the poor areas of Los Angeles is filmed in low-key lighting and every scene in the richer areas of Los Angeles is filmed in a higher-key lighting to be able to emphasize on the fact that the rich are more privileged than the poor. The city for example, is filled with people, buildings and pollution. All of that would not seem as bad if the bright sun was shinning throughout the day; the lighting makes us understand that the living conditions there are in fact atrocious.
Angles/Camera Movement:
- Low-angle shot: When Deckard is hanging from the building trying to escape from Roy, Roy is on the roof and is filmed in a low angle to make him seem more powerful, while Deckard seems even more vulnerable. This angle could also be focusing on the fact that Roy is being the "bigger man" during this scene. Roy spares Deckard's life, rather than kill him out of revenge for murdering his Replicant friends, or even out of self-defense, considering that Deckard repeatedly tries to kill Roy.
- Pan: When Zhora is trying to escape from Deckard, the director uses a pan to film her to emphasize on how fast she is running to reinforce the fact that she is a Replicant. The panning of the camera somehow makes us feel more sympathetic toward her. Its as if we know she will not make it out alive, because she remains in the camera's frame rather than running in the distance to her safety.
Props:
- The “enhancing photo printer”: Deckard uses to investigate pictures focuses on the fact that this movie take place in the future, because back when the movie was made, this kind of technology was not even imagined to be possible to invent.
- The “Voigt-Kampff” test machine: used to determine whether someone is a Replicant also focuses on the fact that this movie takes place in the future. Such a machine nowadays would be overruled by a lying detector, but because of its futuristic look, its purpose remains fulfilled.
Universal Themes:
Dived Between Rich and Poor: There has always been a division between the wealthy and the poor; they practically live in two separate worlds. This is very clear throughout the movie when it comes to how crowded, polluted and dark the poor neighbourhoods are as opposed to the wealthier neighbourhoods that are more exclusive (less crowded), cleaner and fancier, as well as much brighter. This segregation is seen in our society as much as the previous ones and the ones to come. The rich will never want to be associated with the poor and most of them will do everything in their power to make sure that they stay on top while the poor suffer at the bottom. This has caused and will keep causing conflicts in the world; it must be stopped. At this point however, it would be practically impossible, considering how capitalistic we have become.
Human Morality: This movie goes back and forth with human morality – judging what is right and what is wrong. Deckard has a difficult time with that when he is asked to kill all Replicants, considering that he falls for one and could possibly be one. This is a topic that has been brought up in music, art, photography, poems, etc. It is such a conflicting subject because although humans have done so much damage to the world, we cannot help but think that there is still hope for us; that we are capable of so much more. That is the message Blade Runner sends when they show us Deckard escaping with Rachael: they make us believe that Deckard has seen the wrong in killing Replicants who clearly have a sense of emotion and that he is willing to fight for his new girlfriend’s life and possibly his own.
Word Count: 1403.
Word Count: 1403.
Critique:
We rate this movie ⭐⭐⭐⭐!
Blade Runner is not a movie created with the intention of making the audience watch it with ease. By possessing a pessimistic attitude towards an unknown future and by exploring the sad truth of sexism and women's sexualization, we could say that Blade Runner is a representation of a hellish world. This movie is set in 2019 Los Angeles, a city distorted by immense buildings, flying cars and air full of smoke, smog and dust. The darkness and the rain are a constant reminder of the sinister and disturbing dystopian world that we are transported to. Underneath the overcrowded population, the overwhelming towers and the smog is an aura of claustrophobia, paranoia and constant depression. And, in the shadows of the buildings we can also sense a feeling a hierarchy in the human race through sexism. The main characters, Deckard and Roy are strong men with important roles whereas the main female characters (Rachael and Pris) have the undermining roles of being their lovers, for example. In addition Zhora, another important female character, is a stripper. The scene during which Deckard and Rachael have a sexual intercourse emphasizes on woman’s sexualization by initiating it with what seems to be rape. This specific intercourse was disturbing to watch; Deckard is in a way raping Rachael by ordering her to "say kiss me" after she had attempted to leave his apartment. The entire tone of the movie changed during those five minutes; you could even say that it is scarier and darker than the previous fighting and chasing scenes. It makes the audience feel all sorts of emotions, which is an amazing aspect of this movie. Another great scene, for example, would be the last last scene. We initially fear Roy but that feeling of terror transforms into a feeling of sadness and empathy. The acting was a wonderful success. The movie’s protagonist, portrayed by Harrison Ford, is able to balance his character’s scruffy hunter side and his vulnerable side quite amazingly. Rutger Hauer who played the role of Roy Batty portrayed the ultimate villain’s development with expertise. Blade Runner is a movie that we recommend to anyone who wishes to experience an emotional roller coaster, wonderful acting and impressive sets, considering the year it was made.
We rate this movie ⭐⭐⭐⭐!
Connections to the Course Material:
Most Replicants knew their expiration date; when they will die. If it were possible, would you like to know how and when you die? For what reasons?
_________________________________________________________________________________
Other Links:
The first connection that we could make between the movie and the course material is personhood. As mentioned in class, personhood is defined as the status of being a person, a legal or social category that will vary across cultures and across political concept s of equality and liberty. In the movie, this subject is addressed through the description of a new kind of beings, who are not defined as human beings, but as ‟Replicants ″. Replicants look like humans, but are very different in many aspects; they are faster, stronger and smarter. Some of them even have memories programmed into them. Replicants are banished from the earth, which evidently means that they are not legal citizens of our planet. They can be detected by taking the Voight Kampff test. Supposedly Replicants lack empathy which after answering a series of conflicting questions, is how they are differentiated from humans. We think that Replicants should have personhood, because they clearly do feel emotions, but they should not be considered as human beings.
The second connection that we can make is consciousness. Consciousness is the quality or state of being able to perceive or be aware of an external object or something within oneself. In Blade Runner, Replicants are very smart: they have all five sense that humans have, they can imagine things, reflect and they have emotional responses. Replicants are therefore conscious beings, but they are not treated as such; they are treated as if they were objects that are simply there to serve.
The third connection between the movie and the material viewed in class are social robots. We learned that social robots are autonomous machines that are capable of interacting and communicating with humans. In the movie, Replicants are evidently social robots since they are very independent. They can live on their own, feed themselves and communicate perfectly with other beings. Humans are not even able to tell them apart from other humans at the first glance. Even a Replicant itself (Rachael) did not even know that she is a Replicant. This just shows that the technology in Blade Runner is way more advanced than what we are used to when it comes to social robots.
Question Time:
Most Replicants knew their expiration date; when they will die. If it were possible, would you like to know how and when you die? For what reasons?
There was a scene throughout the movie during which Deckard practically forces himself on his lover, Rachael, and asks her to "tell me you want me [...] tell me you love me." Since she is a Replicant, she does not necessarily know how to feel. Would you consider this as an act of rape or as a desperate attempt to make Rachael feel something?
As seen in class, the uncanny valley is the feeling of attraction and wanting to know more about something as well as repulsion by that same thing. What would be uncanny about Replicants? Their lack of empathy while still being able to love, or the fact that although they look human, they posses powers that no human could ever have?
Other Links:
Social Robots: In the movie, Replicants are used as personal slaves or for company. Yet as their intelligence grew, they became harder to live with since they were becoming stronger. This link relates to the movie in how social robots could be used nowadays, considering that the future is now.
Doll Lover: In Blade Runner, Deckard (who could himself be a Replicant) falls in love with Racheal, a Replicant. In the movie, this would be considered impossible since Replicants are not supposed to feel emotions. In this video, a man is head over heels for his sex doll and would do anything for her. Even though she isn't real, he feels like she would do anything for him as well; that she loves him in return.
Sources:
Wikipedia Contributors. "Blade Runner." Wekipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 3 Mar. 2018.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner
YouTube (2018). Blade Runner (1982) Official Trailer - Ridley Scott, Harrison Ford Movie. [online]
Golden, John. “Introducing Cinematic and Theatrical Elements in Film.” TeachWithMovies.
Kelly, McKinney. “The Matrix Study Guide.” 31 Jan. 2018.
Kelly, McKinney. “Non-human animals (nha) and Selfhood Study Guide.” 14 Feb. 2018.




Hi I am answering the first question: Most Replicants knew their expiration date; when they will die. If it were possible, would you like to know how and when you die? For what reasons?
ReplyDeleteHumans by nature, if they knew when and how they will die, they will try and stop it or change it. For me, I know I wouldn't change the way I will die or avoid it or try and stop it, also maybe I can't avoid it or stop it maybe I will die from just being old, which is eve harder. But living my whole life knowing exactly when I will die and how would be a burden. On an epistemological level, what makes us believe that we don't already know on some level how we will die? On a metaphysical level, what if we are already dead and we are nothing but a ball of emotions called "spirit"? knowing that we will die and how and when will be torturing ourselves, while we are already dead. I wouldn't want to torture myself emotionally and end up realising that I am already dead. Aren't we all really dead since the moment we are born? Since the day we breathe our first breath we start a long journey towards death. We all know how life on earth will end for everyone. I would want to have the excitement of mystery.
Brianna Doherty:
ReplyDeleteI will respond to the third question. I think the most uncanny thing about the Replicants come from their lack of empathy but still being able to love and their extra capabilities. When we think about human robots we think of them as machines that are not meant to feel anything. They are meant to specialize in one or many tasks and to do those tasks in a very efficient way. We don’t imagine them to be programed to be more human than us humans. In the film, Tyrell says something like, the more human the better. The fact that Replicants are basically more human than human with their extra strength and other capabilities that we do not have is unsettling.
Yo I'm also answering that first question...
ReplyDeleteOk so I'd rather not know when I'm going to die. If I did, it'd be like a timer ticking down and my life would feel like a list of chores or tasks until my eventual end. I mean, at some point you need to come to grips with the fact that life is finite, but I feel like that is what makes it so valuable and precious. If we all lived forever, then time would become meaningless and now I know I'm wandering into a weird field we haven't talked about in this class so I'll bring it back around. With regards to epistemology, not knowing certain things is better than having the answers to everything. It's these little details that really give life a splendor that would be all for not if humans were all everlasting gods or something.
Sorry about the bizarre nihilistic talk to whichever poor sap falls upon this!
Anyways, that's just my two cents for my 3%.
This movie seems very interesting and I find this group did an excellent job of putting in on display because I'm actually very interested in watching it. This movie reminds me of any kind of love story that involves forbidden love. Take Romeo and Julie for example. Both their families didn't want one with the other and thus they had to fight for their love to be together. Although I don't know much about this movie or how it ends it seems as though this main character falls in love with artificial intelligent being also known as a replicant in the film. She makes him question whether or not these AI beings can have such feelings. In Romeo and Juliet, their family's actions make them question whether or not betraying their parents is worth the risk. In both cases, they have to dishonour the norms of their families and societies to be happy and to be in love together. This further puts into question the idea of whether AI beings can love or can have feelings in general.
ReplyDeleteTo answer question 1, if I would like to know when and how I would die. I absolutely would not want to know when I die. My reasoning for this is because I wouldn't want to live my life knowing how my death will happen and when it will come. I prefer living my life to the fullest and not be living with a constant fear looming over me of knowing my fate.
ReplyDeleteI will be answering question #1: "Would you like to know how and when you die? For what reasons?"
ReplyDeleteI would personally not want to know how and when I would die. The main reason for this is because I think that if I were to know I would be living in constant fear of the approaching day, or live in constant fear of whatever I know would be the thing to kill me. For example if I knew I would die in a car crash, I wouldn't want to live the rest of my life terrified of cars or intersections. Another reason I wouldn't want to know the time of my death is because i think that knowing this information could prevent you from experiencing and enjoying life the closer the date comes. I think that keeping the time and cause of your death unknown is the best way to continue living your life to its full potential.
I will be responding to question 1, "Most Replicants knew their expiration date; when they will die. If it were possible, would you like to know how and when you die? For what reasons?"
ReplyDeleteIf I had the choice, I would not like to know how and when I will die. While some people may want to know how and when they will die for the purpose of reassurance, I feel that knowing this information would burden me. Some people may argue that they would want to know when and how they die so that they can do everything they've ever wanted to do before they die, but I don't think death should be a motivating factor to do the things you want to do. I want to experience life and do the things I want because I'm alive and living, not because I'm destined to die. Death is inevitable, and I would rather live my life in the present moment doing the things I love instead of incessantly worrying about death.